Agents do the work; your people make the calls. Approval gates, policies set by your admins and a complete audit trail keep every consequential step in human hands.
Put a gate anywhere in a workflow. The run parks there, the owner is emailed the findings so far, and nothing downstream moves until they approve. Reject, and the workflow takes the branch you drew for it.
Gates are decided by the workflow's owner. No shared inbox, no "someone on the team": the person who published the automation is the person accountable for its approvals.
The approval carries the agent's findings with citations back to the code, tickets and pages behind them, so the decision is made on what the agent actually found.
Every gate has an expiry. An approval nobody gets to is a timed-out step, visible in the run history, never a workflow silently stuck for a month.
One governance portal decides what agents may do in your organization, and every setting there is enforced at run time, not merely suggested.
The audit log is written by the agent runtime itself as tool calls are permitted or refused, so it records what agents did, not what someone later said they did.
pytest tests/authallowedauth/session.pyallowedcurl https://…denied · policyauth/session.pyallowedReview the fix planawaiting ownerOne platform: your tools, your knowledge, your rules.
Read more →Digital workers you define, down to what they may touch.
Read more →A live, private understanding of what your company knows.
Read more →A growing catalog of connectors for the tools you already run.
Read more →Deployed in minutes. Priced to the dollar.